‘The End of Oak Street’—a family adventure with teeth

Director David Robert Mitchell, better known for atmospheric, slow-building horror, brings an unexpected discipline to the genre here. He resists the temptation to over-explain the mechanics of the portal or the science behind it, choosing instead to keep the camera fixed on the people navigating this upheaval. The result is a film that moves briskly between thrill and stillness, appealing equally to children hungry for chase sequences and to the parents watching alongside them, who will recognise something quieter and more familiar unfolding underneath the spectacle.

That quieter thread belongs to Anne Hathaway and Ewan McGregor, cast as a married couple whose polite, clipped exchanges betray a distance that predates the dinosaurs entirely. Hathaway plays restraint with real precision, letting frustration surface in glances rather than dialogue, while McGregor leans into a wounded, overcompensating charm that makes their scenes together feel lived-in rather than scripted. Their arc, forced reliance on each other and eventually their children, gives the film an emotional spine that never tips into sentimentality, even as the plot around them stays deliberately uncomplicated. It is a smart piece of casting: two actors capable of carrying tension in silence, set against a backdrop that rarely allows anyone a quiet moment.

The world-building, meanwhile, is where the film does its most sophisticated work. Oak Street itself, rendered first as a manicured, slightly sterile American suburb, becomes a useful visual counterpoint once it is transplanted into prehistoric wilderness. Familiar mailboxes and picket fences sit half-swallowed by ferns; a garden hose becomes an unlikely weapon. The production design leans on this friction between domestic normalcy and primordial threat, and it is more effective than any amount of dialogue could be in conveying just how far from home these characters now are.

Read more: 10 fresh sci-fi novels to read in 2026, from Martha Wells to George Saunders

Inevitably, the dinosaurs are what audiences will remember. The film’s creature design reflects a welcome commitment to current palaeontological thinking, most notably the now widely accepted evidence that many theropods carried proto-feathers rather than the smooth, reptilian hides popularised by earlier blockbusters.

The result is genuinely striking: predators that look less like resurrected reptiles and more like something closer to enormous, dangerous birds, texturally unfamiliar in a way that makes the chase sequences feel fresh rather than derivative. Anyone who grew up on the original Jurassic Park comparisons will notice the shift immediately, and it is to the film’s credit that this update feels like a deliberate artistic choice rather than a mere technical flex.

Also from Tatler: The year of Anne Hathaway: inside the star’s packed 2026 release schedule

Cinematography plays no small part in that immersion. Wide, sweeping shots of the transplanted Oak Street against dense prehistoric canopy give the film real scale, and the decision to favour long, unbroken takes during the chase sequences pays off in visceral terms; the audience feels the pursuit rather than simply watching it assembled from cuts. This is very much a film built for the largest screen available, and it rewards an IMAX viewing in particular. The format’s added vertical frame does real work here, letting the height of the canopy and the sheer scale of the animals register in a way a standard screen cannot quite match. Sound design, too, benefits from the format, with low-frequency footfalls and distant roars given room to breathe.

Taken together, the film earns its place as reliable, unpretentious family entertainment rather than prestige cinema, and that distinction is worth making plainly. It borrows its emotional architecture, and to some extent its narrative shape, from the marital-tension-under-pressure formula that has powered disaster and survival films for decades, and it does not attempt to disguise that debt.

Read more: Gird your loins: an honest review of ‘The Devil Wears Prada 2’ (2026)

What elevates it above formula is craft: assured direction, two leads who understand how to work in a register above the material, and visual effects that reflect genuine engagement with contemporary science rather than nostalgia alone. The End of Oak Street will not linger in conversation the way more ambitious films might, but as an afternoon spent together in a cinema, it delivers exactly what it promises, and delivers it well.

NOW READ

Goddess glow: Anne Hathaway’s ‘The Odyssey’ style is rewriting the rules of maternity fashion

Sam Neill’s best roles: 8 ‘reluctant guardian’ performances that showcased his quiet brilliance

10 flops, misfires and misunderstood movies worth rewatching now