Cover Patek Philippe Nautilus ref. 5711

What’s with the craze over some watch models, and why can’t anyone seem to get their hands on them?

There's never a dull moment in the world of luxury watches. The Quartz Crisis usually comes to mind first, of course, but one needn't look so far into the past. Just over a decade ago, the Swatch Group's decision to only supply complete movements to external buyers caused a cascade effect that saw brands scrambling to develop their own calibres. In turn, this gave rise to the narrative that in-house movements are superior and/or more legitimate.

More recently, the advent of smartwatches prompted brands to respond with their own takes, from hybrid movements to "smart" straps. The threat posed by smartwatches on demand for mechanical ones never came to pass, and most of these efforts were abandoned.

The latest trend concerns scarcity. Consider Patek Philippe's current version of the Nautilus ref. 5711, which has a green dial to replace the previous iteration's blue. Walk into any authorised dealer for the brand, and you'll quickly learn that stocks are unavailable. The salesperson attending to you will offer you a spot on their waitlist instead. You could receive the timepiece eventually—eight years is a commonly cited waiting time—if it hasn't been discontinued by then, that is. How the waitlist works at any dealer works is opaque though; perhaps “black box" is a more appropriate term. Here's the kicker: should you be lucky enough to be able to buy said watch today, you could sell it on the secondary market immediately for anything between eight and 10 times its retail price of S$46,000. What gives?

Read more: Christmas Gift Guide 2021: The Best Luxury Watches For That Special Someone

Demand and Desirability

Tatler Asia
Patek Philippe, 5711_1A_014_PRESS
Above Patek Philippe Nautilus ref. 5711

Clearly, there is a disproportionate level of demand for the Nautilus ref. 5711 that has spilled over into the secondary market, which explains the hefty premium it commands there. Neither Patek Philippe nor the Nautilus are alone in this though. Around the world and to varying degrees, watches from Rolex's Professional collection (i.e. its "sports" models) and Audemars Piguet's Royal Oak lines are facing similar shortages. To a lesser extent, a few other brands are experiencing this as well. But let's keep the discussion to these three manufacturers for now, and examine the factors that have led to the present state of affairs.

An easy answer can be gleaned with the reductionist approach—the price for any item is a function of its demand and supply, and demand has clearly risen in the past few years. Several reasons account for this. The most recent is obviously the ongoing pandemic, which has shifted consumption patterns. With travel spending curtailed due to border closures, many consumers have turned to luxury goods instead. In Singapore, for instance, many brands have (informally) shared with us that domestic spending has increased in 2020 and 2021, sometimes to the extent of more than making up for the shortfalls in revenue from tourists.

Beyond just the recent impacts of Covid-19, however, the winds of change have already been blowing elsewhere for several years. Horology and its related pursuits, which used to be the domain of aficionados hanging out in person or on specialist forums, have entered the mainstream. Information is now democratised, and the asymmetry that used to define the industry has largely disappeared.

In case you missed it: 'No Time To Die': All The Watches That Appear in the New James Bond Movie

Tatler Asia
Above Rolex Oyster Perpetual Cosmograph Daytona

Interested in a watch? You can find out everything you want about a model, including its price history, with a simple Google search, instead of trawling through tomes—if you even had access to them. This has contributed to a fluid market and, as a result, higher demand.

The rise of social media platforms—Instagram especially—has raised demand even further. For one, it’s never been easier to join an online community. Humans are tribal by nature, after all, and aficionados have long organised themselves, with the Paneristi community being a forerunner. What better way to belong to a club, however informally, than with a timepiece that grants you automatic membership? Hype culture, which has also contributed to the ongoing Logomania in high fashion, has made watches desirable as status symbols as well as signalling devices.

Finally, there are casual buyers who aren’t necessarily into watches, but desire them all the same. They might have read reports of the profits to be made should they secure Rolex’s Oyster Perpetual Cosmograph Daytona. Or heard the mantra that “a Royal Oak is a good investment” repeated one too many times. The end result is the same: new buyers are entering the market and, consequently, higher demand.

Read more: Christie's to Auction One-of-A-Kind Rolex Deep Sea Special No.1 This November

The Supply Issue

Tatler Asia
Above Audemars Piguet Royal Oak Selfwinding

What about the supply of these watches though? Why haven’t Patek Philippe, Rolex, or Audemars Piguet increased their production numbers? After all, the brands themselves do not benefit directly from inflated prices on the secondary market—their business is largely wholesale, and their retailers are barred from selling above the recommended retail prices. Producing more of these watches will thus directly boost their revenue. On the flipside, not meeting this demand is essentially lost business, since they are leaving money on the table. Worse still is the potential for them to lose the goodwill of frustrated potential customers.

Unfortunately for consumers, revenue (and profit) maximisation isn’t the be all and end all for these manufactures. Instead, they often take the long view, and place as much emphasis (if not more) on goals such as brand equity. It isn’t a coincidence that all three companies are privately owned—Rolex belongs to a private trust, while Patek Philippe and Audemars Piguet are family-owned businesses.

Without the pressure to please shareholders at the end of every financial quarter, the three brands have had much freedom to adopt their various strategies. At the last edition of Salon International de la Haute Horlogerie (SIHH), for instance, Audemars Piguet’s CEO Francois-Henry Bennahmias shared that the brand’s revenue and profitability have increased despite producing fewer watches. The brand achieved this by pivoting towards its higher priced offerings, while focusing on delivering the same level of excellence in its products.

Patek Philippe’s CEO Thierry Stern, on the other hand, has reiterated numerous times that he is determined to keep the production of steel timepieces to current levels of around 25 to 30 per cent of overall numbers. Raising numbers just to meet demand will, in his opinion, dilute the brand’s image and its desirability.

Rolex, which has traditionally been coy on such matters, recently broke its silence on the subject. The brand emphasised the importance it places on the quality of its products, and declared that it is impossible “to meet the existing demand in an exhaustive way” without compromising on its standards.

Don't miss: Clockwise with Austen Chu: How To Start Collecting Watches

The Way Forward

There are no simple answers here, and figuring out the best way to game the system is out of the scope of this article. Some commentators have labelled the current situation a “bubble”, which implies that demand can and will fall eventually—and perhaps even drastically. A black swan event such as a financial crisis could precipitate this. No one’s going to be losing any sleep over the prospect, however. As an interviewee once shared with me, a bubble could be anything from a soap sud to a Zeppelin, and the latter seems more appropriate at this juncture. Still, the watch industry has never remained static, so this too shall pass, and we may all get the watches we desire. Eventually.

Topics