After a fatal Xiaomi SU7 crash, China’s MIIT bans misleading self-driving claims, requiring SAE Level 2 terms and stricter software update rules
Rapid advancements in automotive technology have significantly levelled the playing field for Chinese car manufacturers. Today, advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS) are offered as standard features even in entry-level models sold in China. These systems typically include adaptive cruise control, lane-keeping assist, automatic emergency braking, parking assist and blind spot detection.
Higher-end variants now come with more sophisticated forms of ADAS, sometimes referred to as full self-driving (FSD) or autonomous driving features. However, these terms are increasingly being scrutinised—especially by government regulators.

Above SAE levels of driving automation (Photo: SAE International)
For global markets, the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE), in collaboration with the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), has set out a five-tier framework to define levels of driving automation, from Level 0 (no automation) to Level 5 (full automation).
Levels 0 to 2 require full driver engagement, even if assistance features are present. True automation begins at Level 3, where the car can operate independently in specific conditions, progressing to Level 5, where no human input is needed at any time.
Also read: Waymo's self-driving tech might just change how the world moves
How autonomous are self-driving cars?

Above A fully autonomous WeRide Robotaxi GXR operating in Beijing (Photo: WeRide)
There is currently no commercially available passenger vehicle in the market with the equivalent of Level 5 driving autonomy. Driverless robotaxis deployed by Chinese companies such as Apollo Go and WeRide have been operating in cities such as Shenzen, Wuhan, Guangzhou, Nanjing and Beijing. In other parts of the world, Waymo’s robotaxi service is available in limited areas in several cities in the United States. The current generation of robotaxis used by these companies generally fall under Level 4 autonomy.
Also read: The battle for EV dominance is shifting toward Asia. Here are the Chinese brands to watch out for
New guidelines from China’s Ministry of Industry and Information Technology
In February 2025, China’s Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT) issued new guidelines for automakers, cautioning them against overstating the capabilities of their ADAS. The MIIT stressed that marketing language must not suggest a vehicle is capable of fully autonomous or FSD capabilities if it only features basic driving assistance.
Under these rules, companies are cautioned not to overstate the effectiveness of the driving aids and avoid language that implies otherwise. For vehicles with driving assistance, the vehicle should be able to safely stop in case it detects that the driver is no longer actively driving. The MIIT also required companies to submit a report within 48 hours in case of a vehicle collision when ADAS is active or when it fails.
In mid-April, MIIT took an additional step by making its policy on full self-driving more clear. It held a meeting with major car manufacturers and ordered for a ban of public testing of driving assistance software. Automakers also need to secure government approval before making enhancements to existing ADAS software via over-the-air updates as well as introducing new features.
A fatal crash involving a self-driving Xiaomi EV

Above Xiaomi's SU7 electric sedan is available with advanced driving assist (Photo: Xiaomi)
These stricter regulations come after a fatal crash that killed three people while aboard a Xiaomi SU7 EV in March. The vehicle’s navigation on autopilot (NOA) intelligent driving assistance was engaged when it was travelling at 116 km/h as it entered a construction zone. While the vehicle detected the obstacle and alerted the driver who resumed control, the vehicle hit a concrete post at 97 km/h.
Under the new directive, automakers can no longer use terms such as “autonomous and automatic driving,” “smart driving,” “self-driving,” and “advanced smart driving”. The new term that should be used is “combined assisted driving.” Car makers should also use the SAE automation level classification, namely Level 2 assisted driving. OTA updates should be fully verified and tested first before being pushed to the users. Emergency software updates for vehicles will follow standard recall procedures.
Banned terms and redefined classifications
Even fully automated parking features that don't require direct driver input are now banned. This includes driverless valet parking and remote control features. Driver monitoring systems must be active at all times and cannot be turned off. A driver should keep their hands on the wheel at all times. If drivers remove their hands from the wheel for 60 seconds, the car will have to slow down and safely pull over.
Another important change aims to discourage carmakers from providing frequent over-the-air updates. Emergency updates will require following the recall procedures and the State Administration for Market Regulation approval. The new regulations will mostly impact carmakers positioned at the forefront of autonomous driving technology, like Tesla, Huawei, Xpeng, Li Auto and Nio.

Above Nio showcased 11 models at the Shanghai Auto Show. The Firefly is Nio's brand for a small EV hatchback (Photo: NIO)
At the Shanghai Auto Show that started last April 23, automakers have largely followed the new directive. Most of the car makers emphasised safety first instead of ADAS or autonomous driving features. Other makers chose to highlight upcoming models instead.
With the pause in developing full self-driving technology, it’s quite safe to say that China’s automakers will focus on other areas to innovate and iterate. While traditional global manufacturers often take six to eight years to develop a single model, Chinese companies can roll out new cars in as little as 18 months, making them hard to beat in terms of agility.



