Whether you’re coming for Milly Alcock’s breakout turn as Kara Zor-El or simply to see where James Gunn’s DC Universe heads next, ‘Supergirl’ is an experience best seen on the big screen. Fair warning, minor spoilers ahead
For a cinematic universe still finding its footing, Craig Gillespie’s Supergirl arrives with something surprisingly valuable: a personality of its own. Milly Alcock’s portrayal of the iconic superhero takes the hope and optimism that defined David Corenswet’s Superman and flips it on its head, delivering a grittier and more emotionally turbulent chapter for DC’s new era without losing sight of what makes these characters worth rooting for.
The easiest shorthand for Supergirl would be to call it Mad Max meets Guardians of the Galaxy, as the film shares its rough-and-tumble road-trip energy and the colourful cosmic eccentricity of both. Yet reducing it to those influences would undersell what the director and cast members achieve here. Beneath the space adventure lies a surprisingly intimate story about loss, identity and belonging, anchored by Alcock’s fiercely vulnerable performance as Kara Zor-El.
More from Tatler: Meet Eve Ridley, the Filipina-British actress bringing Ruthye Marye Knoll to life in ‘Supergirl’

Above David Krumholtz as Zor-El in ‘Supergirl’ (Photo: Warner Bros. Pictures)
One of the film’s greatest strengths is how it expands our understanding of Krypton. For decades, audiences have largely viewed the fallen planet through Clark Kent’s memories and second-hand stories. Supergirl gives us a different perspective. Kara remembers Krypton not as a distant myth but as a home she actually lost. The result is a more intimate exploration of the culture, trauma and emotional weight that shaped her long before she arrived on Earth and how it makes her pain feel deeply personal.
At the centre of that journey is Ruthye Marye Knoll, played brilliantly by Eve Ridley. The young Filipina-British actress is the film’s emotional anchor. Ruthye’s determination, vulnerability and evolving relationship with Kara give the story its strongest moments. In many ways, this is as much Ruthye’s film as it is Supergirl’s.

Above Eve Ridley as Ruthye in ‘Supergirl’ (Photo: Warner Bros. Pictures)
Then there is Alcock. Despite the endless comparisons to previous live-action versions of the character and the inevitable scepticism that came with her casting, Alcock silences every doubt. She understands what makes Kara fundamentally different from Clark. She is impulsive, angry, reckless and still learning how to channel her grief. Alcock embraces those contradictions and delivers a performance that feels authentic rather than performative. Most importantly, she never tries to imitate Superman.
Unexpectedly, the film’s emotional heartbeat comes from the least talkative member of the cast. Krypto provides many of the story’s most heartfelt moments. His presence softens Kara’s rough edges and adds a layer of warmth that prevents the film from becoming too bleak. Whenever the story threatens to sink into darkness, Krypto reminds us why we care.

Above Kara and Krypto in ‘Supergirl’ (Photo: Warner Bros. Pictures)
See also: ‘House of the Dragon’ finally delivers the Battle of the Gullet—and questions why we wanted it
A scene-stealer is Jason Momoa’s portrayal of Lobo. For years, fans have argued that the actor was born to play the foul-mouthed intergalactic bounty hunter, and Supergirl only strengthens that case. Momoa brings the same larger-than-life charisma that made him a standout in previous comic book roles, but here it feels like a perfect match rather than a reinterpretation. Lobo’s swagger, humour and sheer unpredictability fit him like a glove, making it difficult to imagine anyone else behind the character.

Above Jason Momoa as Lobo in ‘Supergirl’ (Photo: Warner Bros. Pictures)
Not everything lands, however. Matthias Schoenaerts brings menace to Krem of the Yellow Hills, but the character never quite reaches his full potential. While the film remains faithful to the comics, Krem often feels more like a plot device than a fully realised antagonist. A deeper exploration of his motivations could have elevated the conflict and given the story a more compelling emotional payoff.

Above Matthias Schoenaerts as Krem in ‘Supergirl’ (Photo: Warner Bros. Pictures)
The action, surprisingly, is another area where the film leaves you wanting more. Not because it is bad, but because it feels restrained. There are flashes of how devastatingly powerful Kara can be, yet the film rarely lets her unleash that power in a truly memorable way. For a character capable of moving mountains and surviving suns, some of the climactic battles feel contained. There is a sense of wanting more to see Supergirl fully cut loose.
If Superman represented the hopeful soul of James Gunn’s DC Universe, then Supergirl represents its emotional complexity. Together, they paint a promising picture of a franchise that understands superheroes can be inspiring without being simplistic.
Is it a safe film? In some ways, yes. It rarely takes risks that might alienate mainstream audiences. But it is also confident enough to distinguish itself from its predecessor while deepening the story around one of DC’s most beloved heroes.
Supergirl is now showing in Philippine cinemas.





