The art of shaping: The design battlefield of emotion, power, and collective memory

A chair is never just a seat; it is where the designer quietly encodes human intention. Take, for example, a feudal throne crafted from solid gold, carved with dragons by a master artisan, its scale calculated to dominate a palace chamber, positioned so that all who speak to the throne must look up. The designer has interlaced material wealth, visual symbolism, spatial dominance, and ideological messaging into a single object, ensuring all who approach it are positioned within an unspoken but unyielding hierarchy. The leather seat in a modern corporate boardroom may be a more secular successor to that ancient throne, but the authority built into the design remains unchanged.

Likewise, a vast urban square is not simply built for leisurely strolls. It reflects how a regime wishes to project its national image from the arrangement of flagpoles and statues to the directional flow of roads. Consider Haussmann’s redesign of Paris: the long, straight boulevards were not merely for aesthetic enjoyment, but strategically planned so cavalry and artillery could swiftly move to crush uprisings. The rise of a metropolis, shaped by blueprints that anticipate and direct the actions of millions with differing rights and duties, stands as a striking testament to one truth: design is power.

At the micro level, an iPhone is far more than a simple communication tool. This digital ecosystem has been meticulously designed to capture attention, extend engagement, and fuel a cycle of endless consumption. From the vertical swipes to the flashing colours of notifications, and the grid-like display of apps, each element results from deliberate design choices with profound impact on billions of users, while delivering extraordinary profits to those who shape the digital experience. Design, then, is far from neutral. Its goals may range from enhancing daily life to subtly steering behaviour, making it one of the most influential forces of our age.

Read more: Tatler’s picks: A round of June contemporary art

In agricultural societies, design was not recognised as a distinct profession. Craftsmen were designers by nature, drawing on instinct and hands-on experience to produce items that were both useful and expressive. Rarely did they sketch detailed plans: they worked directly with materials, guided by intuition. Creativity was always rooted in the individual and the local.

A soup spoon, whether rough or refined, still carried the artisan’s unique imprint, unlike the uniform products of modern factories, where thousands of identical spoons must conform precisely to a technical drawing.

Since the Industrial Revolution, design has evolved into an indispensable and increasingly complex craft. The capitalist market demands that designers standardise and refine products to meet and shape consumer expectations. By the late 19th century, design had been fully separated from craft. Movements such as Arts & Crafts in Britain, and later Bauhaus in Germany, laid the foundations for a new kind of designer: one who not only created objects but also reimagined ways of living. Politicians and economists, too, began to view design as a vehicle for reshaping civic life.

The Bauhaus, for instance, was more than an art school. It served as a social experiment, using design to help reorganise society in the wake of World War I. Objects like the Wassily chair, the Wagenfeld lamp, and Gropius’s architectural work were all aimed at shaping a new citizen: one who was rational, efficient, and modern. No longer the privilege of an elite, design was recast as a tool to make beauty accessible. And beauty, once a matter of individual taste, became subject to the dual authority of function and form at the societal level.

Turning against this ideology, the second half of the 20th century saw design take on a broader philosophy. Designers no longer focused solely on objects; they began rethinking ways of living. Dieter Rams’s principle of “Less but better” at Braun (Germany) became a minimalist response to the rise of consumerism, which had turned design into a badge of post-war excess. His creations, whether radios, tape recorders or irons, sought to restore a sense of purpose, helping individuals locate themselves in an ever-growing sea of consumer goods.

From the 1980s through to the close of the century, design also embraced countercultural energy and emerging technologies. Sony’s Walkman redefined not just the music player, but the very idea of private experience in public spaces. Around the same time, Philippe Starck became the poster child for a more expressive, postmodern approach. His Juicy Salif orange squeezer was not merely a kitchen tool but a bold visual statement, challenging conventions of function and prompting design to reconnect with its artisanal roots.

At the mass level, weary of postwar bourgeois aesthetics, companies like IKEA revolutionised interior design by blending practicality, affordability, and a clean, minimalist design language. At the same time, they reshaped consumer behaviour, encouraging people to buy, self-assemble, and regularly refresh their furnishings. This success gave rise to an arguably idealistic vision: design for the world, where people from vastly different cultures might live with remarkably similar objects.

As we entered the 21st century, digital technology ushered in a new paradigm: behavioural design, or user-centred design. No longer confined to physical goods, design began to influence even the smallest gestures: how you scan a paragraph in an app, how a “buy now” button appears in step with algorithmic logic, how platforms like Facebook and TikTok employ “infinite scroll” to trap users in a seamless loop. Design no longer merely responds to needs, it invents them.

Technology companies engineer experiences. By designing with the dopamine cycle in mind, they nudge users toward compulsive behaviours. In this landscape, the boundary between design and manipulation grows ever more elusive.

One of the most charged intersections of design and manipulation is message design: turning visual strategy into a potent means of crafting and communicating ideas. From Shepard Fairey’s Hope poster for Barack Obama’s 2008 campaign, with its red, blue, and beige palette and upward-gazing expression, to the clean sans-serif typography of Joe Biden’s Build Back Better slogan, design doesn’t just support a message, it gives abstract ideals a recognisable form. This is communication engineered to slip, almost invisibly, into the public psyche.

Elements such as colour, font, and layout go beyond surface beauty: they signal values. Serif fonts can evoke heritage and authority, while sans-serif suggests innovation and approachability. Even clothing choices and stage design are part of the strategy. Consider French President Emmanuel Macron delivering speeches framed by both the French and European flags, or the logos crafted for each G7 summit, tailored to reflect the host nation's visual identity—these are calculated exercises in political design.

Design, at its most impactful, becomes a battleground for emotion, authority, and collective memory. When wielded with intention, it can turn a political campaign into a cultural moment—reverberating well beyond a ballot box into the shared consciousness of an entire generation.

In its ideological role, design helps shape identity on every scale—from national symbolism to personal expression. It informs what we recognise as “us”: from flags, uniforms, currencies, and brand marks to the interfaces we use and the layout of our homes. Design is how identity is signalled, reinforced, and reimagined over time.

In a world defined by design, the question is no longer whether we are shaped by it, but whether we can use it to shape something better. Contemporary design philosophies are working to reclaim the designer’s ethical position as mediator between technology, culture, and humanity.

This shift is visible in the environmental design movement. Whether through recycled materials, disassemblable products, or innovations like Michael Braungart’s cradle to cradle system, sustainable design speaks to more than function; it signals responsibility.

Inclusive design is another pillar of this future-focused mindset. Rather than treating people with disabilities as exceptions, today’s design begins with diverse needs and expands outward. Wheelchair ramps, for instance, have become standard—not just for disabled individuals but for parents with prams, the elderly, and even travellers pulling luggage.

Decentralised design, open-source systems, co-creation, and blockchain are all challenging legacy structures. In these models, users shift from passive consumers to active participants, collaborators in the design of their own experiences. This signals the dawn of aesthetic democracy: where everyone, in some form, can imagine and reshape the world around them.

Ultimately, design is not just an industry; it is an ideology. It underpins how we live, how we organise societies, and how we envision what lies ahead.

From a Chanel dress to an iPhone interface, from a public park to a campaign billboard, design is the most commanding force sculpting the world we inhabit. And now, more than ever, we need ethical, intelligent designers to ensure that beauty is never divorced from progress.

NOW READ

Loewe Craft Prize 2025: A new definition of ‘couture’ arises from artisan workshops

Artist Trung Nghia and the journey of reviving beauty from ashes

Three decades of preserving and renewing national lacquer paintings by Nguyen Quoc Huy